Perspective Place-Based Designations, Eden Kinkaid

Explore the Perspective Place-Based Designations, Eden Kinkaid study material pdf and utilize it for learning all the covered concepts as it always helps in improving the conceptual knowledge.

Subjects

Social Studies

Grade Levels

K12

Resource Type

PDF

Perspective Place-Based Designations, Eden Kinkaid PDF Download

PERSPECTIVE DESIGNATIONS EDEN DESIGNATIONS AND CERTIFICATION IN A GLOBALIZED FOOD SYSTEM Eden is a candidate in Geography in the School of Geography , Development , and Environment at the University of Arizona . research focuses on local and heritage food in Arizona and engages themes of place , development , and certification . Eden also conducts research on the impacts of the pandemic on system of southern Arizona . 148 DESIGNATIONS

Learning Outcomes After reading and discussing this text , students should be able to Explain the emergence of designations as a response to and product of the globalization of food . Discuss the rise of certification within contemporary trends in governance . Review the role of designations in strategies of rural development . Identify critiques and shortcomings of nations . INTRODUCTION GLOBALIZATION AND THE PLACELESS FOOD SYSTEM What is the meaning of place in an increasingly globalized food system ?

Do the particular landscapes and cultures of food duction continue to matter in a food system premised on mity , standardization , and ?

Given the steady rise of designations for food around the world , it may be too soon to claim that place no longer matters in our global food system . nations , like the French appellation ( trolled designation of origin ) system have long existed to authenticate that certain products originate from their regions and are produced using traditional practices . These systems rely on the concept of idea that the specific qualities of a product are linked to the environmental and cultural characteristics of its region of production . Since the EDEN 149

, internationally recognized designations , like Geographical Indication ( GI ) have become part of global and food governance , or governance . These continue to be taken up with enthusiasm around the world as a way of inserting place back into the global food tem . This brief overview examines designations with a focus on three key topics the globalization of food systems , as a technique of governance , and the role of designations in rural development . It then turns to a discussion of the critiques of designations . While the term designation covers a range of labels and projects , the focus here is on internationally recognized systems , like and GI . While it is difficult to make any hard and final claims about the impacts of designations , it is clear that they have illuminated place as a terrain of in our food systems , making them an important topic for food scholarship . THE GLOBALIZATION OF FOOD The industrialization and globalization of food systems have transformed the places and landscapes where food is produced . These transformations have resulted in a placeless food system in which food products are standardized , anonymized , and connected from the landscapes , seasons , and sites of their duction . Yet these processes of industrialization and globalization have not proceeded without resistance . Rather , consumers and broader social movements have resisted the of agriculture by asserting the right to know where their food comes from and by honoring regional food and cultural traditions . 150 DESIGNATIONS

It is in this context that We have seen the global expansion of designations , through which a particular food Tequila or only legally refer to products produced Within a historical region of production using traditional methods . These designations not only link foods to particular places but are premised on the idea that place is what gives particular foods their characteristic tastes and ( the concept of ) strive to reinforce the and meanings of place , but also serve to limit what producers from that place can do to innovate and transform their practices . Figure A packaged Camembert de ( source , via Commons ) Given this connection to tradition and place , are thus seen as a counterpoint to the globalization of food . Along these lines , and describe designations as a source of resistance against the effects of EDEN 151

less food Similarly , argues that based designations offer opportunities to retrieve history , inscribe locality , and facilitate resistance against global For these scholars , connecting food with place is seen as a means of countering the processes and impacts of globalization . AUTHENTIC FOODS THE RISE OF CERTIFICATION While designations can be understood as a response to the globalization of agriculture , they are , like other forms of certification , also very much a product of the of agriculture . The rise of certification systems for food products is part of the complex shifts that have occurred as the governance of food and agriculture has become globalized . To understand how certification has emerged and , we need to understand this broader context of governance the institutions , rules , and regulations that shape the production and trade of food and agricultural products . As the food system has become more globalized , new forms of governance have emerged to regulate the production and trade of food . Power to regulate food and agriculture have shifted away from states , and toward global governing bodies like the World Trade Organization . These institutions set standards for food quality and safety that shape the rules of international trade in food . As global governing bodies attempt to harmonize national standards to facilitate international trade , global have increasingly come to shape the production of food across the globe . certifications are one such standard that has emerged to designate and authenticate specialty that are produced in particular places ( GI , or in . and 2008 , 2011 , 2044 . 152 DESIGNATIONS

ways ( organic , fair trade ) Because consumers can not verify the origins or qualities of food produced around the globe , these standards serve to guarantee the quality of foods on the global market . These processes of certification have also emerged in response to a demand for and authentic foods that have particular environmental , social , and cultural values embedded within them . The emergence of new forms of consumer and education , and other lifestyles , and various food movements have bolstered the demand for and authentic foods . Because these foods carry a price premium , it is necessary to certify the claims they make that differentiate them from generic commodities . How can I be assured that my Camembert cheese is an authentic product of Normandy , rather than a case of false advertising ?

Here , certification systems like and GI have emerged as a way to support the claims being made by food producers , while ensuring transparency , authenticity , and quality in globally traded food products . In this way , We can understand based designations as both a response to the impacts of a food system and a product emerging from the context of global governance and trade . CAPTURING VALUE RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND What are the benefits of designations ?

In addition to authenticating the origin of a food product , are promoted for their potential to protect rural cultures and bolster local and regional economies Because designations add value to a product , they produce price that are ( ideally ) captured by producers and thus support . et al . 2014 . EDEN 153

agrarian livelihoods ( although this is not always the case ) Beyond adding value to food products , designations are often part of efforts to promote rural landscapes and heritage through forms of tourism focused on agriculture and rural life , like . In this sense , designations port the marketing of both products and places they highlight a region unique agrarian and culinary heritage and help mote it as a tourist destination . For many regions around the world , and gastronomic tourism are seen as for rural development that can support , rather than erase , locally specific forms of food , farming , and culture . While the histories and meanings of development vary regionally around the world , designations like Geographic Indication have been seen as potentially contributing to forms of rural and agricultural economic development in both the Global North and Global South . In the Global North , has come to play a significant role in rural economies as these regions have transitioned from production to consumption . The term consumption landscape describes how some rural landscapes have become less oriented toward commodity food production and have shifted to more diversified , activities , including tourism and In this context , has been seen as a strategy for rural and farm diversification , through which rural areas can support social goods including the protection of agricultural landscapes and agrarian cultural heritage . In the Global South , designations have similarly been seen as a way to promote biodiversity and cultural traditions , and , critically , as a means for increasing export revenues , launching a product into global circulation , and promoting In both , by . 2010 . Woods 2009 , 2010 . 154 DESIGNATIONS

marketing the landscapes , products , and places of food tion , farmers and other stakeholders seek to capitalize on the agricultural heritage of regions while connecting them to new economic circuits . However , given the different histories and meaning of development in the Global North and Global South , it is important to attend to broader cultural , and historical when evaluating the potentials of designations in any given place . IMPLICATIONS As previously discussed , proponents of designations argue that they can counter the impacts of globalization , support local food economies , contribute to rural development , protect cultural heritage , and provide various other cultural and benefits . Yet others remain critical of how well based designation and other forms of certification can accomplish these ambitious goals . In what follows , two critiques of designation are considered ( a ) that it reproduces dominant modes of governance , and ( that it duces uneven development . and market solutions One of the major critiques of designation as a form of certification is that it can reproduce and practices . What does this mean ?

refers to a philosophy and practice of governance that emerged in the 19705 in Europe and the United States , and which remains dominant today across the globe . Premised on the primacy of the market as a regulator of social approaches emphasize privatization , and other forms of as solutions to social and environmental . Allen 2006 . EDEN 155

, entailing a shift in power from state to According to doctrine , social and environmental problems are best solved through solutions . For example , in the case of air pollution , a , solution would entail trading the right to pollute by buying and selling credits ( the right to pollute a given quantity ) on the market . An example of a approach would be enforcing emissions laws through state agencies . Forms of certification , including , are part of this trend in governance . Instead of addressing the systemic problems of our food system through regulations , reform , or social movements , approaches like food labelling leave it up to the market and consumers to make socially and environmentally conscious choices ( by paying a price premium ) From this perspective , solving the problems of our globalized industrial food system becomes the ity of consumers , rather than the responsibility of the food and agricultural industry or the state . According to critics like man , certification does not actually challenge this system rather , it merely allows privileged consumers to pay their way to healthier , more ecological , more socially just , and more authentic food , all while leaving the system intact . Other ars argue that food labels can spur on collective action and serve as a point of resistance to the logics of a globalized food Understanding designations and other forms of certification as both a symptom of and a response to governance is key to evaluating its strengths and as a strategy of governance and rural ment . Harris 2010 . 156 DESIGNATIONS

Uneven Other critics of certification point to how these strategies can produce benefits that are unevenly shared . First , the narratives underwriting these that rely on ideas of tradition , place , and be constructed in ways that valorize certain producers and practices while excluding others . This occurs as various actors attempt to control narratives of place and tion to suit their interests and ensure that they can claim the value produced by designations . Second , the benefits of designations and other forms of food certification , like price premiums , may flow to some more than others , and thus can reproduce unequal social For example , 201 ) describes how attempts to secure a GI for a traditional Indian beverage , ended up benefiting and distributors at the expense of producers of the , who may not even know about the designation and its value . In the case of the GI status of tequila in Mexico , similarly demonstrates how negotiations over the details of the designation , including quality standards , processing protocols , and dynamics between small producers , and have diluted the meaning of the GI designation . describes actors have manipulated production and certification policies in ways that contradict the concept of a GI and negatively affect the overall quality of Further , any kind of designation relies on the demarcation of traditional regions and techniques of duction , thus recognizing some producers as eligible for tion while excluding others . 10 . 2011 . 11 . 2010 . EDEN 157

12 . Figure Jose agave plantation in Tequila , source media , 440 , via Commons ) These problems are not unique to designations but accompany any attempt to produce value through the distinction of labels and processes of certification . points to how all certification systems are built on barriers to entry allow some to benefit from designations while excluding Thus , rather than seeing designations as a panacea to issues of rural development and the problems of a globalized food system , we need to approach these projects cally , with an awareness of both their potentials and limitations . CONCLUSION As this discussion suggests , designations open up complex questions and practical challenges concerning food , globalization , governance , and rural change . This 2007 . 158 DESIGNATIONS

complexity means that there is no single verdict on the impacts or merits of designations as a general approach , nor are there any uniform effects of such designations . Instead , how designations affect particular places and landscapes depends upon how they are pursued that is , by Whom , for whom , and at what scale . This is because designations , like any form of certification , are not simply a technical standard to be implemented , but a strategy of governance located within uneven , cultural , and power relations . To stand their impacts , strengths , and limitations , we must pursue careful empirical research about particular certification projects in specific places . The general problems outlined here can aid us in approaching specific cases of designations with a critical lens and Within their larger historical context . Discussion Questions What is ?

How do claims to a given food from other food products ?

How can designations be understood as both responses to and products of the of food systems ?

In what ways can designations tribute to rural development ?

What are the major shortcomings or critiques of designation as a form of rural ?

Additional Resources EDEN 159 , 2020 . Constructing durian and geographical indications in Penang , Singapore journal of Tropical , 41 ( 2007 . Making Salami , Producing The Transformation of Ethnos 72 ( Ives , and . 2014 . Geographical The Promise , Perils and Politics of Protecting Products , Sage Handbook on Intellectual Property , Thousand Oaks , CA , Sage Publications . 2017 . Knowing Where it Comes From Labeling Foods to Compete in a Global Market . University of Iowa Press . 2011 . Remaking Place The Social Construction of a Geographical Indication for Environment and 43 ( 2008 . The Taste A into . Berkeley University of California Press . References Allen , and . 2006 . From Old School to School From the Ground Agriculture and Human Values 23 ( 2003 . Translating The Global Challenge of French journal of Rural Studies 19 ( 2003 ) 2010 . Development From Within ?

The Potential for Geographical Indications in the Global The of World Intellectual Property 13 ( 160 DESIGNATIONS , and . 2014 . Geographical The Promise , Perils and Politics of Protecting based Sage Handbook on Intellectual Property . Thousand Oaks , CA Sage Publications . 2007 . The Way ?

Voluntary Food Labels as Antipode 39 ( Harris , 2009 . or a Politics of the Possible ?

Reading for Difference in Alternative Food Area 41 ( 2010 . Locating value in artisan cheese reverse for American gist , 112 ( Remaking Place The Social Construction of a Geographical Indication for Environment and Planning A 43 ( and . 2008 . Creating the Taste of Place in the United States Can We Learn from the French ?

73 ( Woods , 2004 . Rural Geography Processes , Responses and in Rural Restructuring . New York Sage . EDEN 161